Carbonic and Semi-Carbonic Maceration
Technical guide to carbonic maceration, semi-carbonic maceration, and whole-cluster fermentation; enzymatic mechanisms, production protocols, and style applications.
Carbonic and Semi-Carbonic Maceration
Problem Definition
Carbonic maceration (CM) and semi-carbonic maceration (SCM) are specialized fermentation techniques that produce wines with distinctive aromatic profiles and soft tannin structures. These methods, famously associated with Beaujolais Nouveau (from Gamay) but applied across multiple regions and varieties, involve intracellular (anaerobic) fermentation before traditional yeast fermentation. Understanding the biochemical mechanisms, production protocols, and appropriate applications allows winemakers to deploy these techniques effectively for specific style goals.
Technical Context
True Carbonic Maceration
Definition: Whole, intact berries placed in CO₂-saturated (anaerobic) environment; intracellular enzymes convert sugar to alcohol without yeast involvement initially.
Mechanism:
- Intact berries in CO₂ atmosphere
- Intracellular enzymes (glycolytic enzymes in vacuole) convert malic acid and sugar
- Ethanol production within berry (up to 2-2.5% ABV)
- Cell death from ethanol accumulation
- Berry rupture releases must
- Traditional yeast fermentation completes conversion
Conditions Required:
- 100% CO₂ atmosphere (no oxygen)
- Intact, undamaged berries (hand-harvested)
- Temperature: 25-35°C optimal
- Duration: 7-21 days (before pressing)
Semi-Carbonic Maceration
Definition: Whole clusters/berries with some crushing; bottom layer ferments normally, producing CO₂ that creates anaerobic conditions for upper berries.
Mechanism:
- Mix of crushed and whole berries
- Bottom layer: Traditional alcoholic fermentation
- CO₂ production saturates headspace
- Upper berries: Carbonic maceration effects
- Gradual mixing as berries soften/rupture
- Continuous rather than sequential process
Common Approach:
- More practical than true CM
- Less labor-intensive
- Intermediate character
- Beaujolais standard practice
Biochemical Transformations
During Intracellular Fermentation:
- Malic acid reduction (30-50%)
- Partial sugar conversion (1-2% ABV)
- Volatile ester synthesis (banana, kirsch aromatics)
- Color extraction from skins (gentler than traditional)
- Tannin reduction (softer mouthfeel)
Characteristic Compounds Formed:
| Compound | Aroma | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Ethyl cinnamate | Cherry, cinnamon | Intracellular synthesis |
| Benzaldehyde | Cherry, almond | Anaerobic metabolism |
| Ethyl acetate | Fruity, solvent (excess) | Fermentation |
| Isoamyl acetate | Banana | Ester synthesis |
| 4-Vinylguaiacol | Clove, spice | Phenolic conversion |
Options and Interventions
Production Protocol (True CM)
Equipment Requirements:
- Sealed, pressurizable tanks (or CO₂ blanket system)
- CO₂ source (liquid CO₂ or dry ice)
- Temperature control
- Gentle pressing capacity
Process Steps:
- Harvest: Hand-pick whole clusters; no crushing
- Tank fill: Layer whole clusters; avoid crushing
- CO₂ saturation: Fill headspace with CO₂ (eliminate O₂)
- Seal: Hermetic closure; maintain CO₂ atmosphere
- Temperature: 30-35°C accelerates intracellular fermentation
- Duration: 7-21 days (style-dependent)
- Press: Gentle pressing; yield ~65-75%
- Yeast fermentation: Complete conversion
- MLF: Often completed quickly
Production Protocol (Semi-CM)
Process Steps:
- Harvest: Machine or hand; some whole clusters, some crushed
- Tank fill: Layer with bottom third crushed, top whole clusters
- Seal: Cover tank; natural CO₂ from fermentation
- Temperature: 25-30°C
- Duration: 5-14 days
- Punchdown: Optional; accelerates process
- Drain/Press: Combined free-run and press fractions
- Complete fermentation: May continue in tank or barrel
Whole-Cluster Fermentation (Related Technique)
Distinction from CM:
- Not necessarily anaerobic
- Stems included (tannin contribution)
- Traditional Burgundy technique
- Not all berries undergo CM
Characteristics:
- Stem tannins (if lignified)
- Partial CM effect on whole berries
- Structure + aromatic complexity
- Pinot Noir tradition
Trade-offs and Risks
Advantages of CM/SCM
- Distinctive aromatic profile (kirsch, banana, candy)
- Soft tannin structure
- Early drinkability
- Fresh fruit character
- Malic acid reduction (natural softening)
Disadvantages and Risks
- Limited aging potential (typically)
- Aromatic intensity fades
- Volatile acidity risk (anaerobic bacteria)
- Temperature control critical
- Labor-intensive (true CM)
- Equipment requirements
Temperature Risks
| Temperature | Effect |
|---|---|
| <20°C | Slow intracellular fermentation; limited CM effect |
| 25-35°C | Optimal CM; rapid transformation |
| >38°C | Berry damage; off-aromas; excessive extraction |
Practical Implications
Variety Suitability
Highly Suited:
- Gamay (Beaujolais) - Classic application
- Grenache - Fruity, soft styles
- Carignan - Softens otherwise harsh variety
Moderately Suited:
- Syrah - Fresh styles; co-fermentation
- Cinsault - Fruity rosé and light reds
- Tempranillo - Young wines (Rioja joven)
Less Common:
- Cabernet Sauvignon - Structure compromised
- Nebbiolo - Traditional style conflicts
- Pinot Noir - Whole-cluster more common than CM
Regional Applications
Beaujolais (France):
- Semi-carbonic maceration standard
- Gamay primary variety
- Nouveau: 4-5 weeks post-harvest release
- Cru Beaujolais: Partial CM in some cuvées
Rioja (Spain):
- Maceración carbónica tradition
- Young wines (Joven/Cosecha)
- Full CM less common today
- Tempranillo and Garnacha
- Partial CM in some Grenache productions
- Co-fermentation with traditional lots
- Blending component
Blending with Traditional Wines
Common Approach:
- CM wine: 20-40% of blend
- Traditional wine: 60-80%
- Adds aromatic lift and freshness
- Maintains structure and complexity
References
-
Ribéreau-Gayon, P., Dubourdieu, D., Donèche, B., & Lonvaud, A. (2006). “Handbook of Enology, Volume 1.” Wiley. Publisher Link
-
Flanzy, C., Flanzy, M., & Benard, P. (1987). “La Vinification par Macération Carbonique.” INRA. DOI: 10.1051/jphyscol:198710
-
Tesnière, C. & Flanzy, C. (2011). “Carbonic Maceration Wines: Characteristics and Winemaking Process.” In: Molecular Wine Microbiology. Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-375021-1.10009-3
-
INAO (2024). “Beaujolais AOC Specifications.” https://www.inao.gouv.fr
Last Updated: January 6, 2026