ESC

Start typing to search across all content

Red Wine Production

Carbonic and Semi-Carbonic Maceration

Technical guide to carbonic maceration, semi-carbonic maceration, and whole-cluster fermentation; enzymatic mechanisms, production protocols, and style applications.

Carbonic and Semi-Carbonic Maceration

Problem Definition

Carbonic maceration (CM) and semi-carbonic maceration (SCM) are specialized fermentation techniques that produce wines with distinctive aromatic profiles and soft tannin structures. These methods, famously associated with Beaujolais Nouveau (from Gamay) but applied across multiple regions and varieties, involve intracellular (anaerobic) fermentation before traditional yeast fermentation. Understanding the biochemical mechanisms, production protocols, and appropriate applications allows winemakers to deploy these techniques effectively for specific style goals.

Technical Context

True Carbonic Maceration

Definition: Whole, intact berries placed in CO₂-saturated (anaerobic) environment; intracellular enzymes convert sugar to alcohol without yeast involvement initially.

Mechanism:

  1. Intact berries in CO₂ atmosphere
  2. Intracellular enzymes (glycolytic enzymes in vacuole) convert malic acid and sugar
  3. Ethanol production within berry (up to 2-2.5% ABV)
  4. Cell death from ethanol accumulation
  5. Berry rupture releases must
  6. Traditional yeast fermentation completes conversion

Conditions Required:

  • 100% CO₂ atmosphere (no oxygen)
  • Intact, undamaged berries (hand-harvested)
  • Temperature: 25-35°C optimal
  • Duration: 7-21 days (before pressing)

Semi-Carbonic Maceration

Definition: Whole clusters/berries with some crushing; bottom layer ferments normally, producing CO₂ that creates anaerobic conditions for upper berries.

Mechanism:

  1. Mix of crushed and whole berries
  2. Bottom layer: Traditional alcoholic fermentation
  3. CO₂ production saturates headspace
  4. Upper berries: Carbonic maceration effects
  5. Gradual mixing as berries soften/rupture
  6. Continuous rather than sequential process

Common Approach:

  • More practical than true CM
  • Less labor-intensive
  • Intermediate character
  • Beaujolais standard practice

Biochemical Transformations

During Intracellular Fermentation:

  • Malic acid reduction (30-50%)
  • Partial sugar conversion (1-2% ABV)
  • Volatile ester synthesis (banana, kirsch aromatics)
  • Color extraction from skins (gentler than traditional)
  • Tannin reduction (softer mouthfeel)

Characteristic Compounds Formed:

CompoundAromaSource
Ethyl cinnamateCherry, cinnamonIntracellular synthesis
BenzaldehydeCherry, almondAnaerobic metabolism
Ethyl acetateFruity, solvent (excess)Fermentation
Isoamyl acetateBananaEster synthesis
4-VinylguaiacolClove, spicePhenolic conversion

Options and Interventions

Production Protocol (True CM)

Equipment Requirements:

  • Sealed, pressurizable tanks (or CO₂ blanket system)
  • CO₂ source (liquid CO₂ or dry ice)
  • Temperature control
  • Gentle pressing capacity

Process Steps:

  1. Harvest: Hand-pick whole clusters; no crushing
  2. Tank fill: Layer whole clusters; avoid crushing
  3. CO₂ saturation: Fill headspace with CO₂ (eliminate O₂)
  4. Seal: Hermetic closure; maintain CO₂ atmosphere
  5. Temperature: 30-35°C accelerates intracellular fermentation
  6. Duration: 7-21 days (style-dependent)
  7. Press: Gentle pressing; yield ~65-75%
  8. Yeast fermentation: Complete conversion
  9. MLF: Often completed quickly

Production Protocol (Semi-CM)

Process Steps:

  1. Harvest: Machine or hand; some whole clusters, some crushed
  2. Tank fill: Layer with bottom third crushed, top whole clusters
  3. Seal: Cover tank; natural CO₂ from fermentation
  4. Temperature: 25-30°C
  5. Duration: 5-14 days
  6. Punchdown: Optional; accelerates process
  7. Drain/Press: Combined free-run and press fractions
  8. Complete fermentation: May continue in tank or barrel

Distinction from CM:

  • Not necessarily anaerobic
  • Stems included (tannin contribution)
  • Traditional Burgundy technique
  • Not all berries undergo CM

Characteristics:

  • Stem tannins (if lignified)
  • Partial CM effect on whole berries
  • Structure + aromatic complexity
  • Pinot Noir tradition

Trade-offs and Risks

Advantages of CM/SCM

  • Distinctive aromatic profile (kirsch, banana, candy)
  • Soft tannin structure
  • Early drinkability
  • Fresh fruit character
  • Malic acid reduction (natural softening)

Disadvantages and Risks

  • Limited aging potential (typically)
  • Aromatic intensity fades
  • Volatile acidity risk (anaerobic bacteria)
  • Temperature control critical
  • Labor-intensive (true CM)
  • Equipment requirements

Temperature Risks

TemperatureEffect
<20°CSlow intracellular fermentation; limited CM effect
25-35°COptimal CM; rapid transformation
>38°CBerry damage; off-aromas; excessive extraction

Practical Implications

Variety Suitability

Highly Suited:

  • Gamay (Beaujolais) - Classic application
  • Grenache - Fruity, soft styles
  • Carignan - Softens otherwise harsh variety

Moderately Suited:

  • Syrah - Fresh styles; co-fermentation
  • Cinsault - Fruity rosé and light reds
  • Tempranillo - Young wines (Rioja joven)

Less Common:

Regional Applications

Beaujolais (France):

  • Semi-carbonic maceration standard
  • Gamay primary variety
  • Nouveau: 4-5 weeks post-harvest release
  • Cru Beaujolais: Partial CM in some cuvées

Rioja (Spain):

  • Maceración carbónica tradition
  • Young wines (Joven/Cosecha)
  • Full CM less common today
  • Tempranillo and Garnacha

Southern Rhône:

  • Partial CM in some Grenache productions
  • Co-fermentation with traditional lots
  • Blending component

Blending with Traditional Wines

Common Approach:

  • CM wine: 20-40% of blend
  • Traditional wine: 60-80%
  • Adds aromatic lift and freshness
  • Maintains structure and complexity

References

  • Ribéreau-Gayon, P., Dubourdieu, D., Donèche, B., & Lonvaud, A. (2006). “Handbook of Enology, Volume 1.” Wiley. Publisher Link

  • Flanzy, C., Flanzy, M., & Benard, P. (1987). “La Vinification par Macération Carbonique.” INRA. DOI: 10.1051/jphyscol:198710

  • Tesnière, C. & Flanzy, C. (2011). “Carbonic Maceration Wines: Characteristics and Winemaking Process.” In: Molecular Wine Microbiology. Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-375021-1.10009-3

  • INAO (2024). “Beaujolais AOC Specifications.” https://www.inao.gouv.fr


Last Updated: January 6, 2026