Wine Blending Principles

Introduction

Wine blending (assemblage) is both an art and a science—the practice of combining different component wines to create a final product greater than the sum of its parts. Whether blending different grape varieties, vineyard parcels, fermentation vessels, or vintages, the goal is achieving balance, complexity, and stylistic coherence. For enologists, understanding blending principles is fundamental because most finished wines involve some degree of blending, from simple lot consolidation to complex multi-vintage Champagne cuvées. Effective blending requires both analytical understanding of component contributions and sensory skill in evaluating harmony.

Fundamental Blending Concepts

Why Blend?

Primary Objectives:

1. Balance: Correct deficiencies in individual components
2. Complexity: Create layered, multi-dimensional wines
3. Consistency: Maintain house style across vintages
4. Style Creation: Achieve specific flavor/structure targets
5. Quality Enhancement: Combine best attributes of components
6. Volume Requirements: Meet production/market demands

Types of Blending

Type	Description	Examples
Variety blending	Different grape varieties	Bordeaux blends; GSM
Vineyard blending	Different vineyard sources	Single appellation wines
Lot blending	Same variety, different tanks	Winery consolidation
Oak blending	Different oak treatments	New + neutral oak lots
Vintage blending	Multiple vintages	Champagne NV; Sherry
Stylistic blending	Different wine styles	Sparkling base wines

Component Assessment

Individual Component Evaluation

Systematic Tasting Protocol:

1. Visual: Color intensity, hue, clarity
2. Aromatic: Intensity, complexity, fruit vs. oak vs. tertiary
3. Palate: Body, texture, tannin, acidity, finish
4. Overall: Quality level, blending potential, defects

Documentation (for each component):

• Analytical data (alcohol, pH, TA, RS, SO₂, VA)
• Sensory notes
• Blending potential assessment
• Volume available

Component Contributions

Common Component Roles:

Component	Typical Contribution
Cabernet Sauvignon	Structure, cassis, aging framework
Merlot	Flesh, softness, plum fruit
Cabernet Franc	Aromatics, freshness, herbs
Petit Verdot	Color, spice, structure
Grenache	Fruit, alcohol, warmth
Syrah	Color, pepper, tannin
Mourvèdre	Structure, gamey, age

Quality Assessment Scale

Rating System Example (1-20 or 100-point):

• 15-17 / 85-89: Good; solid blending component
• 17-18 / 90-94: Very good; lead wine potential
• 18-20 / 95-100: Excellent; minimal blending needed

Blend Trial Methodology

Trial Planning

Systematic Approach:

1. Define Objectives: Target style, quality tier, volume
2. Assess Components: Taste all potential components
3. Identify Roles: Determine each component’s contribution
4. Design Trials: Create logical blend combinations
5. Execute Trials: Prepare precise blends
6. Evaluate Trials: Structured tasting
7. Refine: Adjust based on results
8. Final Blend: Confirm at scale

Trial Execution

Equipment Needed:

• Graduated cylinders (10mL, 25mL, 100mL)
• Pipettes (accurate measurement)
• Clean glassware (identical)
• Component samples
• Documentation sheets
• Calculators

Sample Size: 100mL total convenient for percentage calculations

Example Trial:

• Component A: 60mL (60%)
• Component B: 25mL (25%)
• Component C: 15mL (15%)
• Total: 100mL

Documentation Template

BLEND TRIAL RECORD

Date: ___________
Wine: ___________
Trial #: ___________

Components:
A: _________ (volume: ___ mL, ___%)
B: _________ (volume: ___ mL, ___%)
C: _________ (volume: ___ mL, ___%)

Tasting Notes:
Visual: _________________________________
Aromatic: _______________________________
Palate: _________________________________
Overall Score: _______

Decision: Accept / Reject / Modify
Modification notes: ______________________

Triangular Blending

For Two Components:

• Start with 50/50
• Then try 60/40 and 40/60
• Refine in 5% increments

For Three+ Components:

• Start with equal parts or historical ratios
• Adjust one component at a time
• Document all trials systematically

Mathematical Blending

Pearson Square

Purpose: Calculate blend proportions to achieve target value

Example: Blending two wines to target 13.5% alcohol

Component	Alcohol
Wine A	14.5%
Wine B	12.0%
Target	13.5%

Calculation:

        14.5 --- |13.5 - 12.0| = 1.5 parts Wine A
              X
12.0 --- |14.5 - 13.5| = 1.0 parts Wine B

Ratio: 1.5 : 1.0 = 60% Wine A : 40% Wine B

Verification: (0.60 × 14.5) + (0.40 × 12.0) = 8.7 + 4.8 = 13.5% ✓

Linear Blending Equations

For Any Number of Components:

Target = (V₁ × C₁) + (V₂ × C₂) + … + (Vₙ × Cₙ)

Where:

• V = Volume fraction (must sum to 1.0)
• C = Component value (e.g., alcohol, TA)

Example (Three-component alcohol blend):

Target: 13.8%

• Wine A: 14.2%, 50%
• Wine B: 13.2%, 30%
• Wine C: 14.0%, 20%

Result: (0.50 × 14.2) + (0.30 × 13.2) + (0.20 × 14.0) = 7.1 + 3.96 + 2.8 = 13.86%

Blending for Multiple Parameters

Challenge: Optimizing multiple parameters simultaneously

Approach:

1. Identify most critical parameter (often pH or alcohol)
2. Calculate blend for that target
3. Verify other parameters acceptable
4. Adjust if needed (may require different components)

Software Tools: Blending software can optimize multiple parameters

Sensory Evaluation of Blends

Structured Tasting Protocol

Order of Presentation:

1. Individual components first
2. Blend trials second
3. Reference wines (if available)

Tasting Conditions:

• Controlled temperature (15-18°C)
• Identical glassware
• Neutral environment
• Consistent lighting
• Palate cleansers

Panel Considerations

Panel Composition:

• Lead winemaker
• Assistant winemaker(s)
• Technical staff
• External consultant (optional)

Consensus Building:

• Individual scoring first
• Group discussion after
• Final decision by winemaker

Recognizing Synergy vs. Competition

Synergistic Blending:

• Components enhance each other
• Greater than sum of parts
• Harmony achieved

Competitive Blending:

• Components fight each other
• Disjointed result
• Reconsider proportions or components

Signs of Successful Blend:

• Seamless integration
• Extended complexity
• Balanced structure
• Coherent finish

Style-Specific Blending

Bordeaux-Style Red Blends

Classic Proportions (Left Bank):

• Cabernet Sauvignon: 60-85%
• Merlot: 10-30%
• Cabernet Franc: 0-15%
• Petit Verdot: 0-5%

Goals: Structure + flesh + aromatics + color/spice

Rhône-Style Blends (GSM)

Classic Proportions:

• Grenache: 40-80% (fruit, warmth)
• Syrah: 15-40% (color, pepper, structure)
• Mourvèdre: 5-30% (gamey, structure)

Goals: Warmth + complexity + age-worthiness

White Wine Blending

Common Approaches:

• Barrel vs. tank lots (oak integration)
• Vineyard sources (complexity)
• Varieties (Semillon + Sauvignon Blanc)

Goals: Texture + freshness + complexity

Sparkling Wine Base Blending

Champagne Approach:

• Multiple villages
• Multiple vintages (NV)
• Three varieties
• Reserve wines

Goals: Consistency + complexity + house style

Common Blending Challenges

Problem: Unbalanced Tannin

Solutions:

• Add softer component (Merlot-type)
• Bleed out harsh lot
• Consider fining (if severe)

Problem: High Alcohol

Solutions:

• Blend with lower-alcohol component
• Dealcoholization (if permitted/appropriate)
• Adjust harvest timing (future vintages)

Problem: Insufficient Color

Solutions:

• Add high-color component
• Petit Verdot, Petite Sirah
• Consider grape skin extract (if permitted)

Problem: Flat/Lacking Acidity

Solutions:

• Blend with higher-acid component
• Add tartaric acid (if permitted)
• Reserve pre-MLF component

Problem: Herbaceous/Green Character

Solutions:

• Reduce high-pyrazine component
• Blend with riper lots
• Manage via oak aging

Timing Considerations

When to Blend

Timing	Advantages	Disadvantages
Early (post-fermentation)	Wines integrate together	Less information about components
Pre-aging	Common; good integration	Still developing
Mid-aging	More component information	May not integrate fully
Pre-bottling	Maximum information	Limited integration time

Common Practice: Initial blend decision mid-aging; final adjustment pre-bottling.

Integration Time

After Blending:

• Components need time to marry
• Minimum 2-4 weeks before assessment
• Months preferable before bottling

Quality Control

Post-Blend Analysis

Required Tests:

• Alcohol
• pH and TA
• Free and total SO₂
• Volatile acidity
• Residual sugar
• Color parameters (reds)

Verify: Final blend meets all analytical targets and regulatory requirements.

Stability Testing

Post-Blend Checks:

• Protein stability (whites)
• Tartrate stability
• Microbial stability
• Oxidative stability

Conclusion

Wine blending is a critical skill that combines analytical precision with sensory expertise. For enologists, mastering blending principles enables the creation of balanced, complex wines that exceed the quality of individual components. Whether blending varieties, parcels, or oak treatments, the fundamental approach remains consistent: systematic assessment, logical trial design, careful documentation, and sensory-driven decision-making. The best blenders develop intuition through experience while maintaining rigorous methodology.

References

• Grainger, K. & Tattersall, H. (2016). “Wine Production and Quality.” 2nd Edition. Wiley. Publisher Link

• Zoecklein, B.W. et al. (1999). “Wine Analysis and Production.” Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-6967-8

• Peynaud, E. & Blouin, J. (1996). “The Taste of Wine.” Wiley. Publisher Link

---

Last Updated: January 10, 2026
Research Grade: Technical reference
Application: Blend trial design, component selection, final wine creation