Wine Faults Detection: Identification, Causes, and Prevention Strategies
A comprehensive technical guide to identifying, understanding, and preventing common wine faults including oxidation, reduction, Brettanomyces, TCA, volatile acidity, and other defects.
Wine Faults Detection
Introduction
Wine faults are defects that negatively impact wine quality, ranging from subtle character changes to wines rendered undrinkable. For enologists, the ability to detect faults early, understand their causes, and implement prevention strategies is fundamental to quality winemaking. Some “faults” exist on a spectrum—small amounts adding complexity while larger amounts become defects (e.g., volatile acidity, Brettanomyces). This guide covers the major wine faults, their sensory characteristics, analytical detection methods, causes, and prevention strategies.
Oxidation Faults
Excessive Oxidation
Sensory Characteristics:
- Whites: Brown/amber color; nutty, sherry-like, flat, bruised apple
- Reds: Brick/brown color; dried fruit, prune, loss of freshness
Causes:
- Inadequate SO₂ protection
- Excessive oxygen exposure during processing
- Poor closure seal (cork failure)
- Tank/barrel headspace
- Premature aging (premox in white Burgundy)
Detection:
- Visual: Color assessment
- Sensory: Trained panel
- Analytical: Acetaldehyde levels (>100 mg/L concerning)
Prevention:
- Adequate free SO₂ maintenance
- Inert gas blanketing
- Minimize pump-overs/transfers
- Appropriate closure selection
- See oxidation management
Premature Oxidation (Premox)
Description: Unexpected early oxidation in wines that should age
Affected: Particularly white Burgundy (2000s crisis), especially Chardonnay
Causes: Debated—closure variation, winemaking factors, grape composition
Detection: Premature browning, flat aromatics in young wines
Reduction Faults
Hydrogen Sulfide (H₂S)
Sensory Characteristics: Rotten eggs, sewage, struck match
Threshold: 1-2 µg/L (very low)
Causes:
- Yeast stress during fermentation
- Nitrogen deficiency
- Heavy lees contact
- Reductive winemaking (excessive)
Detection:
- Sensory: Very distinctive aroma
- Analytical: Gas chromatography
Treatment:
- Copper sulfate addition (up to legal limits)
- Aeration
- Racking from lees
Prevention:
- Adequate YAN (yeast assimilable nitrogen)
- Healthy yeast nutrition
- Temperature management
- See reduction management
Mercaptans (Thiols)
Sensory Characteristics: Onion, garlic, rubber, burnt rubber, cabbage
Compounds: Methanethiol, ethanethiol, dimethyl sulfide
Threshold: Very low (0.3-50 µg/L depending on compound)
Causes:
- H₂S evolution (more serious)
- Protein breakdown
- Lees-derived
Treatment:
- Copper addition (limited effectiveness)
- Aeration (may help some)
- Prevention is key
Prevention: Same as H₂S; avoid post-formation
Disulfides
Sensory Characteristics: Cooked cabbage, canned vegetables, rubbery
Compounds: Dimethyl disulfide, diethyl disulfide
Cause: Oxidation of mercaptans
Treatment: Difficult; reduction to mercaptans then copper
Prevention: Address H₂S/mercaptan issues early
Microbial Faults
Brettanomyces
Sensory Characteristics:
- Low levels: Spice, leather, earthy, savory (can be positive)
- High levels: Band-aid, medicinal, barnyard, mouse, fecal
Key Compounds: 4-Ethylphenol (4-EP), 4-Ethylguaiacol (4-EG)
Thresholds:
- 4-EP: 400-600 µg/L (recognition)
- 4-EG: 50-150 µg/L
Sources:
- Infected barrels
- Fruit flies
- Poorly cleaned equipment
- Indigenous on grapes
Detection:
- Sensory: Trained panel
- Analytical: GC-MS for 4-EP/4-EG
- Microbiological: Plating, PCR
Prevention:
- Adequate free SO₂ (>30 mg/L molecular)
- Low pH beneficial
- Hygiene and sanitation
- Barrel management
- See Brett control
Volatile Acidity (VA)
Sensory Characteristics: Vinegar, nail polish remover, sharp
Compounds: Acetic acid, ethyl acetate
Thresholds:
- Acetic acid: 0.5-0.8 g/L (style-dependent)
- Ethyl acetate: 150-200 mg/L
Causes:
- Acetobacter growth (oxygen exposure)
- Some yeast strains
- Stuck fermentation
- MLF bacteria (some strains)
Detection:
- Sensory: Distinctive
- Analytical: Cash still; enzymatic; FTIR
Prevention:
- Minimize oxygen exposure
- SO₂ management
- Sanitation
- Complete fermentations
- See VA prevention
Lactic Acid Bacteria Spoilage
Sensory Characteristics: Sauerkraut, mousy, geranium, butter (excessive)
Compounds: Various
Causes:
- Uncontrolled LAB growth
- Post-MLF spoilage
- Residual sugar + LAB
Prevention:
- Control MLF initiation
- SO₂ post-MLF
- Prevent residual sugar with LAB
Chemical Faults
Cork Taint (TCA)
Sensory Characteristics: Moldy, wet cardboard, musty, damp basement
Compound: 2,4,6-Trichloroanisole (TCA)
Threshold: 1-3 ng/L (extremely low)
Sources:
- Cork (most common)
- Winery environment (barrels, wood, drains)
- Chlorine-based sanitation products
Detection:
- Sensory: Trained panel
- Analytical: GC-MS (very sensitive)
Incidence: 1-5% of cork-sealed wines (varies by cork quality)
Prevention:
- Quality cork selection
- Alternative closures
- Avoid chlorine products
- Environmental testing
Light Strike
Sensory Characteristics: Wet wool, wet dog, cooked cabbage (sulfurous)
Compound: Dimethyl disulfide (from riboflavin photodegradation)
Causes:
- UV/visible light exposure
- Clear or green bottles most susceptible
- Sparkling wines particularly sensitive (see Sparkling Wine Production Challenges)
Prevention:
- Dark bottles (brown most protective)
- Avoid light exposure in storage/retail
- UV-filtering packaging
Heat Damage
Sensory Characteristics: Cooked, stewed fruit, caramelized, maderized
Causes:
- Excessive temperature during shipping/storage
- “Cooked” wine
Detection:
- Sensory: Premature aging character
- Visual: Cork push; seepage
Prevention:
- Temperature-controlled logistics
- Appropriate storage
- Consumer education
Fermentation Faults
Stuck Fermentation
Characteristics: Incomplete fermentation; residual sugar
Causes:
- Nutrient deficiency
- Excessive temperature
- Alcohol toxicity
- Osmotic stress (high sugar)
- Toxic must components
Detection:
- Density measurement
- Residual sugar analysis
- Yeast viability testing
Treatment/Prevention:
Excessive Higher Alcohols (Fusel Oils)
Sensory Characteristics: Hot, solvent, harsh, burn
Compounds: Isoamyl alcohol, isobutanol, etc.
Causes:
- High fermentation temperature
- Nitrogen deficiency
- Yeast strain
Prevention:
- Temperature control (cool fermentation)
- Adequate YAN
- Yeast selection
Sensory Detection Protocol
Systematic Approach
Visual Assessment:
- Color (oxidation, microbial)
- Clarity (microbial, protein)
- Viscosity (alcohol, sugar issues)
Aromatic Assessment:
- First impression (fault or clean)
- Identify fault type
- Intensity rating
- Evolution in glass
Palate Assessment:
- Structural balance
- Fault confirmation
- Finish (faults often persist)
Reference Standards
Training Materials:
- Commercial fault kits (Le Nez du Vin, etc.)
- Spiked samples (known concentrations)
- Regular calibration exercises
Detection Thresholds
| Fault | Compound | Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Cork taint | TCA | 1-3 ng/L |
| H₂S | H₂S | 1-2 µg/L |
| Brett | 4-EP | 400-600 µg/L |
| VA | Acetic acid | 500-800 mg/L |
| Oxidation | Acetaldehyde | 100-125 mg/L |
Quality Control Program
Prevention Framework
- Raw material quality: Grape health, equipment hygiene
- Process control: Temperature, SO₂, oxygen management
- Monitoring: Regular tasting, analytical testing
- Documentation: Track issues for pattern recognition
- Response protocols: Clear action plans for detected faults
Testing Schedule
| Test | Frequency | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Free/Total SO₂ | Weekly-monthly | Oxidation prevention |
| VA | Monthly | Microbial detection |
| pH/TA | Monthly | Stability monitoring |
| Sensory | Ongoing | Early fault detection |
| Brett (4-EP) | Quarterly (reds) | Contamination monitoring |
Conclusion
Wine fault detection is a critical skill for enologists, requiring both sensory expertise and analytical knowledge. Early detection enables intervention before faults become irreversible, while understanding causes enables effective prevention. The best approach is proactive—maintaining optimal SO₂, controlling oxygen, practicing good hygiene, and monitoring wines regularly throughout production and aging.
References
-
Zoecklein, B.W. et al. (1999). “Wine Analysis and Production.” Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-6967-8
-
Ribéreau-Gayon, P. et al. (2006). “Handbook of Enology.” Wiley. Publisher Link
-
Waterhouse, A.L. et al. (2016). “Understanding Wine Chemistry.” Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/9781118730720
Last Updated: January 10, 2026
Research Grade: Technical reference
Application: Quality control, fault identification, prevention strategy