ESC

Start typing to search across all content

OxidationReductionBrettCork TaintVolatile AcidityMicrobial Spoilage

Wine Faults Detection: Identification, Causes, and Prevention Strategies

A comprehensive technical guide to identifying, understanding, and preventing common wine faults including oxidation, reduction, Brettanomyces, TCA, volatile acidity, and other defects.

Wine Faults Detection

Introduction

Wine faults are defects that negatively impact wine quality, ranging from subtle character changes to wines rendered undrinkable. For enologists, the ability to detect faults early, understand their causes, and implement prevention strategies is fundamental to quality winemaking. Some “faults” exist on a spectrum—small amounts adding complexity while larger amounts become defects (e.g., volatile acidity, Brettanomyces). This guide covers the major wine faults, their sensory characteristics, analytical detection methods, causes, and prevention strategies.

Oxidation Faults

Excessive Oxidation

Sensory Characteristics:

  • Whites: Brown/amber color; nutty, sherry-like, flat, bruised apple
  • Reds: Brick/brown color; dried fruit, prune, loss of freshness

Causes:

  • Inadequate SO₂ protection
  • Excessive oxygen exposure during processing
  • Poor closure seal (cork failure)
  • Tank/barrel headspace
  • Premature aging (premox in white Burgundy)

Detection:

  • Visual: Color assessment
  • Sensory: Trained panel
  • Analytical: Acetaldehyde levels (>100 mg/L concerning)

Prevention:

  • Adequate free SO₂ maintenance
  • Inert gas blanketing
  • Minimize pump-overs/transfers
  • Appropriate closure selection
  • See oxidation management

Premature Oxidation (Premox)

Description: Unexpected early oxidation in wines that should age

Affected: Particularly white Burgundy (2000s crisis), especially Chardonnay

Causes: Debated—closure variation, winemaking factors, grape composition

Detection: Premature browning, flat aromatics in young wines

Reduction Faults

Hydrogen Sulfide (H₂S)

Sensory Characteristics: Rotten eggs, sewage, struck match

Threshold: 1-2 µg/L (very low)

Causes:

  • Yeast stress during fermentation
  • Nitrogen deficiency
  • Heavy lees contact
  • Reductive winemaking (excessive)

Detection:

  • Sensory: Very distinctive aroma
  • Analytical: Gas chromatography

Treatment:

  • Copper sulfate addition (up to legal limits)
  • Aeration
  • Racking from lees

Prevention:

  • Adequate YAN (yeast assimilable nitrogen)
  • Healthy yeast nutrition
  • Temperature management
  • See reduction management

Mercaptans (Thiols)

Sensory Characteristics: Onion, garlic, rubber, burnt rubber, cabbage

Compounds: Methanethiol, ethanethiol, dimethyl sulfide

Threshold: Very low (0.3-50 µg/L depending on compound)

Causes:

  • H₂S evolution (more serious)
  • Protein breakdown
  • Lees-derived

Treatment:

  • Copper addition (limited effectiveness)
  • Aeration (may help some)
  • Prevention is key

Prevention: Same as H₂S; avoid post-formation

Disulfides

Sensory Characteristics: Cooked cabbage, canned vegetables, rubbery

Compounds: Dimethyl disulfide, diethyl disulfide

Cause: Oxidation of mercaptans

Treatment: Difficult; reduction to mercaptans then copper

Prevention: Address H₂S/mercaptan issues early

Microbial Faults

Brettanomyces

Sensory Characteristics:

  • Low levels: Spice, leather, earthy, savory (can be positive)
  • High levels: Band-aid, medicinal, barnyard, mouse, fecal

Key Compounds: 4-Ethylphenol (4-EP), 4-Ethylguaiacol (4-EG)

Thresholds:

  • 4-EP: 400-600 µg/L (recognition)
  • 4-EG: 50-150 µg/L

Sources:

  • Infected barrels
  • Fruit flies
  • Poorly cleaned equipment
  • Indigenous on grapes

Detection:

  • Sensory: Trained panel
  • Analytical: GC-MS for 4-EP/4-EG
  • Microbiological: Plating, PCR

Prevention:

  • Adequate free SO₂ (>30 mg/L molecular)
  • Low pH beneficial
  • Hygiene and sanitation
  • Barrel management
  • See Brett control

Volatile Acidity (VA)

Sensory Characteristics: Vinegar, nail polish remover, sharp

Compounds: Acetic acid, ethyl acetate

Thresholds:

  • Acetic acid: 0.5-0.8 g/L (style-dependent)
  • Ethyl acetate: 150-200 mg/L

Causes:

  • Acetobacter growth (oxygen exposure)
  • Some yeast strains
  • Stuck fermentation
  • MLF bacteria (some strains)

Detection:

  • Sensory: Distinctive
  • Analytical: Cash still; enzymatic; FTIR

Prevention:

  • Minimize oxygen exposure
  • SO₂ management
  • Sanitation
  • Complete fermentations
  • See VA prevention

Lactic Acid Bacteria Spoilage

Sensory Characteristics: Sauerkraut, mousy, geranium, butter (excessive)

Compounds: Various

Causes:

  • Uncontrolled LAB growth
  • Post-MLF spoilage
  • Residual sugar + LAB

Prevention:

  • Control MLF initiation
  • SO₂ post-MLF
  • Prevent residual sugar with LAB

Chemical Faults

Cork Taint (TCA)

Sensory Characteristics: Moldy, wet cardboard, musty, damp basement

Compound: 2,4,6-Trichloroanisole (TCA)

Threshold: 1-3 ng/L (extremely low)

Sources:

  • Cork (most common)
  • Winery environment (barrels, wood, drains)
  • Chlorine-based sanitation products

Detection:

  • Sensory: Trained panel
  • Analytical: GC-MS (very sensitive)

Incidence: 1-5% of cork-sealed wines (varies by cork quality)

Prevention:

  • Quality cork selection
  • Alternative closures
  • Avoid chlorine products
  • Environmental testing

Light Strike

Sensory Characteristics: Wet wool, wet dog, cooked cabbage (sulfurous)

Compound: Dimethyl disulfide (from riboflavin photodegradation)

Causes:

Prevention:

  • Dark bottles (brown most protective)
  • Avoid light exposure in storage/retail
  • UV-filtering packaging

Heat Damage

Sensory Characteristics: Cooked, stewed fruit, caramelized, maderized

Causes:

  • Excessive temperature during shipping/storage
  • “Cooked” wine

Detection:

  • Sensory: Premature aging character
  • Visual: Cork push; seepage

Prevention:

  • Temperature-controlled logistics
  • Appropriate storage
  • Consumer education

Fermentation Faults

Stuck Fermentation

Characteristics: Incomplete fermentation; residual sugar

Causes:

  • Nutrient deficiency
  • Excessive temperature
  • Alcohol toxicity
  • Osmotic stress (high sugar)
  • Toxic must components

Detection:

  • Density measurement
  • Residual sugar analysis
  • Yeast viability testing

Treatment/Prevention:

Excessive Higher Alcohols (Fusel Oils)

Sensory Characteristics: Hot, solvent, harsh, burn

Compounds: Isoamyl alcohol, isobutanol, etc.

Causes:

  • High fermentation temperature
  • Nitrogen deficiency
  • Yeast strain

Prevention:

  • Temperature control (cool fermentation)
  • Adequate YAN
  • Yeast selection

Sensory Detection Protocol

Systematic Approach

Visual Assessment:

  1. Color (oxidation, microbial)
  2. Clarity (microbial, protein)
  3. Viscosity (alcohol, sugar issues)

Aromatic Assessment:

  1. First impression (fault or clean)
  2. Identify fault type
  3. Intensity rating
  4. Evolution in glass

Palate Assessment:

  1. Structural balance
  2. Fault confirmation
  3. Finish (faults often persist)

Reference Standards

Training Materials:

  • Commercial fault kits (Le Nez du Vin, etc.)
  • Spiked samples (known concentrations)
  • Regular calibration exercises

Detection Thresholds

FaultCompoundThreshold
Cork taintTCA1-3 ng/L
H₂SH₂S1-2 µg/L
Brett4-EP400-600 µg/L
VAAcetic acid500-800 mg/L
OxidationAcetaldehyde100-125 mg/L

Quality Control Program

Prevention Framework

  1. Raw material quality: Grape health, equipment hygiene
  2. Process control: Temperature, SO₂, oxygen management
  3. Monitoring: Regular tasting, analytical testing
  4. Documentation: Track issues for pattern recognition
  5. Response protocols: Clear action plans for detected faults

Testing Schedule

TestFrequencyPurpose
Free/Total SO₂Weekly-monthlyOxidation prevention
VAMonthlyMicrobial detection
pH/TAMonthlyStability monitoring
SensoryOngoingEarly fault detection
Brett (4-EP)Quarterly (reds)Contamination monitoring

Conclusion

Wine fault detection is a critical skill for enologists, requiring both sensory expertise and analytical knowledge. Early detection enables intervention before faults become irreversible, while understanding causes enables effective prevention. The best approach is proactive—maintaining optimal SO₂, controlling oxygen, practicing good hygiene, and monitoring wines regularly throughout production and aging.

References


Last Updated: January 10, 2026
Research Grade: Technical reference
Application: Quality control, fault identification, prevention strategy